Crime+Scene+Page

media type="custom" key="4713623"

My name is Detective Brock. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a beachouse in florida on the patio a 3:oo. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad who had never been a very liked person. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Vera cruise who is a chemist. Motive? This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the food coloring trail. The evidence was found in square 8 next to a piece of cardboard. The test performed was the brown stain test. The results of the test were that what happened to be a trail of something was either a brown felt pen or brown food coloring and it turned out to be brown food cloring. This connects the suspect to the crime because Vera always carried around brown food coloring. She liked candy with brown coating. The coating color is made from food coloring.

The next piece of evidence collected was the cardboard with a not ndenid on it. It was found in square 8 next to the food coloring trail. The testperformed was decoding notes. The results of the test were the note saiddear martha, I'm so glad it's over.Felix is dead I'll be rich soon Love Vera and then the handwriting matched Vera's handwriting. It was Kendra's handwriting. This connects the suspect to the crime because who else could have wrote exactly like Veraand leave the note?

Another piece of evidence collected was the blood powder found on the scene matches the powder on Vera's shoe. It was found dripped in squares 6, 7, and8. The test performed was the powder test. The results of the test were the powder found at the crime scene matched the powder on Vea's shoe. This connects the suspect to the crime because why would the powder for the fake blood on Vera's shoe? That's what you are supposed to be explaining!

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. Well for the house party Felix invited some friends over named Vera, Gene, Kendra, and Alfredo.Alfredo was hanging out on the patio whith Felix while everyone else was doing their own thing. Then Alfredo went the bathrom while Kendra was taking a shower and let me mind you there was oonly one bathroom but when Alfredo came back at three o' clock he found Felix dead. There were no external injuries. How could this have happened? How did Vera commit the crime?

Therefore, Vera committed the crime of killing Felix for Having such great evidance pointing at her.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || ** Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. ** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 63% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || ** The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ** ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || Two pieces of **shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect.** Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information**  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || ** Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. ** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || ** Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  ** || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  || ** Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  ** || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || ** Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  ** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 36/57